Jan A. Baum

26 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Jan A. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 344
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 5
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14
  • Surgery 142
  • Inorganic Chemistry 12
Replace Rod N. Westhorpe with:
Rod N. Westhorpe Australia
Bernard V. Wetchler United States
Marion Harth Germany
Yuka Matsuki Japan
Daniel Diaz‐Gil United States
Jennifer T. Fortney United States
Maíra I. Rudolph United States
R Charles Adams United States
John Hanson Canada
V. Dimitriou Greece
Jan A. Baum relative to Rod N. Westhorpe Australia Rod N. Westhorpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Rod N. Westhorpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan A. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan A. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan A. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan A. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan A. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan A. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan A. Baum. The network helps show where Jan A. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jan A. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan A. Baum Line = papers co-authored together Jan A. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000107
2 199591
3 199934
4 199527
5 200425
6 199721
7 200118
8
Low Flow Anaesthesia: The Theory and Practice of Low Flow, Minimal Flow and Closed System Anaesthesia
200118
9 199617
10 199413
11 199613
12 200312
13 200111
14
[Nitrous oxide free low-flow anesthesia].
200010
15 19989
16 20009
17 20059
18 20008
19
Clinical applications of low flow and closed circuit anesthesia.
19905
20 19975

About Jan A. Baum

Jan A. Baum is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, History, Emergency Medicine and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (24 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (13 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (344 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (5 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations), Surgery (142 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (12 citations). Jan A. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alan R. Aitkenhead, Richard B. Weiskopf, R. Tenbrinck, Carl III Lynch, Harvey J. Woehlck, Peter Lawin, Hugo Van Aken, Thomas Mollhoff, Klaus Hahnenkamp and Christian Hönemann. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact