James Walmsley

7 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

James Walmsley
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 111
  • Global and Planetary Change 209
  • Insect Science 108
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 86
  • Soil Science 62
Replace Dennis W. Hazel with:
Dennis W. Hazel United States
Laura K. James United Kingdom
Karen E. Hogg Canada
Hamish Kimmins Canada
Janne Rämö Finland
Nerea Oliveira Spain
Bishnu Chandra Poudel Sweden
Laimonas Kairiukstis Lithuania
Jack W. Ranney United States
Damjan Pantić Serbia
James Walmsley relative to Dennis W. Hazel United States Dennis W. Hazel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Dennis W. Hazel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Walmsley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Walmsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Walmsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Walmsley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Walmsley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Walmsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Walmsley. The network helps show where James Walmsley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside James Walmsley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Walmsley Line = papers co-authored together James Walmsley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2009220
2 2009121
3 20037
4 20045
5
How the proposed reintroduction of Eurasian lynx to Britain illustrates competing values and contrasting views associated with humans and the natural world
20163
6
Assessment of the role of corporate environmental reporting in supporting share values in FTSE100 companies
20032
7 20181
8
Forestry in British higher education: a tale of decline and regeneration
20151
9 20220

About James Walmsley

James Walmsley is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Marketing and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (4 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (1 paper), Environmental Sustainability in Business (1 paper), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (111 citations), Global and Planetary Change (209 citations), Insect Science (108 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (86 citations) and Soil Science (62 citations). James Walmsley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas L. Godbold, D Madoc Jones, Brian A. Reynolds, John Robert Healey, Alan Bond, Matt W. Hayward, Grant Sanders, Julian Evans, Tim S. Bracey and Jan Falck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Diseases of the Esophagus, Forest Ecology and Management, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal and Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact