James W. Lim

716 citations
17 papers · 574 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 8
    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 2
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 7
    • Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research 1

James W. Lim

16 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

James W. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Transplantation 70
  • Hepatology 203
  • Surgery 294
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 180
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 185
Replace P. Berloco with:
P. Berloco Italy
Giovanni Consani Italy
Alejandro Manrique Spain
Janusz Trzebicki Poland
Tom Darius Belgium
Daryl R. Wall Australia
Aydıncan Akdur Türkiye
İbrahim Berber Türkiye
E. Capocasale Italy
K Höckerstedt Finland
James W. Lim relative to P. Berloco Italy P. Berloco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
P. Berloco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Lim. The network helps show where James W. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James W. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Lim Line = papers co-authored together James W. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1999162
2 1998108
3 199893
4 200648
5 199840
6 199738
7 199833
8 199717
9 199716
10
"Pants" vein jump graft for portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in transplantation of the liver.
19968
11 19984
12 19982
13 19971
14 20061
15 20191
16 20021
17 20161

About James W. Lim

James W. Lim is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation, Hepatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (7 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (4 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper) and Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (70 citations), Hepatology (203 citations), Surgery (294 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (180 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (185 citations). James W. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynt B. Johnson, Paul C. Kuo, Eugene J. Schweitzer, Jeffrey S. Plotkin, Stephen T. Bartlett, Jacqueline Laurin, Charles D. Howell, Mary J. Njoku, Alan C. Farney and John L. Flowers. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Transplantation Reviews, Clinical Transplantation, The American Journal of Surgery and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact