James Topping
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 1
-
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 1
- Ethics in Clinical Research 1
- Co-authors
- Monique L. Anderson (1 shared paper)Robert Califf (1 shared paper)Karen Chiswell (1 shared paper)Eric David Peterson (1 shared paper)Asba Tasneem (1 shared paper)Keith A. Marsolo (2 shared papers)Jeffrey Scott Brown (1 shared paper)Lesley H. Curtis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (1 paper)Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1 paper)Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (2 papers)eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James Topping
8 papers receiving 450 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 80
- Health Informatics 7
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
- Health Information Management 18
- Pharmacology 27
Countries citing papers authored by James Topping
This map shows the geographic impact of James Topping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Topping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Topping more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Topping
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Topping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Topping. The network helps show where James Topping may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Topping, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 298 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 7 | A shorter intermediate mechanics | 1965 | 2 |
| 8 | The Beginnings of Brunel University | 1981 | 2 |
About James Topping
James Topping is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (80 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations), Health Information Management (18 citations) and Pharmacology (27 citations). James Topping has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Monique L. Anderson, Robert Califf, Karen Chiswell, Eric David Peterson, Asba Tasneem, Keith A. Marsolo, Jeffrey Scott Brown, Lesley H. Curtis, Laura Goettinger Qualls and Thomas A. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications and eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.