James Thomas

34 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

James Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Endocrinology 109
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 93
  • Food Science 120
  • Forestry 26
  • Infectious Diseases 81
Replace Muhammad Yaqoob with:
Muhammad Yaqoob Pakistan
María Salud Rubio Lozano Mexico
Shuyu Wu China
S. V. Ngachan India
Jeffrey L. Dangl United States
Esther Ferrer Spain
Gregg Bogosian United States
Susan E. Girdwood United Kingdom
Ana Paula Ramos Portugal
Michael W. Harding Canada
James Thomas relative to Muhammad Yaqoob Pakistan Muhammad Yaqoob's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Muhammad Yaqoob · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Thomas. The network helps show where James Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Thomas Line = papers co-authored together James Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201060
2 201458
3 199654
4 199145
5 200437
6 201434
7 200328
8 200626
9 201519
10 201318
11 198616
12 201615
13 202012
14 198311
15 201811
16 198611
17 201411
18 201310
19 201910
20 201610

About James Thomas

James Thomas is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Food Science, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Escherichia coli research studies (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (7 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Fecal contamination and water quality (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Pasture and Agricultural Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (109 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (93 citations), Food Science (120 citations), Forestry (26 citations) and Infectious Diseases (81 citations). James Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Tim A. McAllister, Kim Stanford, Tim Reuter, Victor P. J. Gannon, L. Brent Selinger, James Byrne, G.F.W. Haenlein, Nar Gurung, L. M. Kawchuk and D. R. Lynch. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching English With Technology, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health and Cancer Biology & Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact