James T. Thackeray

3.2k citations
91 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

James T. Thackeray

85 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

James T. Thackeray
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 876
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 794
  • Oncology 398
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 269
  • Neurology 68
Replace Timm Dickfeld with:
Timm Dickfeld United States
Mike Kliffen Netherlands
Tohru Ohtake Japan
Akio Kuroi Japan
Masazumi Arai Japan
Jason M. Tarkin United Kingdom
Hideyuki Ikejima Japan
Masanori Ozaki Japan
Götz Münch Germany
Mehran M. Sadeghi United States
James T. Thackeray relative to Timm Dickfeld United States Timm Dickfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Timm Dickfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Thackeray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Thackeray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Thackeray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Thackeray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Thackeray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Thackeray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Thackeray. The network helps show where James T. Thackeray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James T. Thackeray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James T. Thackeray Line = papers co-authored together James T. Thackeray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018237
2 2015154
3 201798
4 202287
5 202070
6 201863
7 201159
8 201659
9 201757
10 201850
11 201449
12 201448
13 201448
14 201245
15 201642
16 202041
17 201938
18 200736
19 202134
20 202034

About James T. Thackeray

James T. Thackeray is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (25 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (22 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (12 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (10 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (9 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (6 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (876 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (794 citations), Oncology (398 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (269 citations) and Neurology (68 citations). James T. Thackeray has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank M. Bengel, Tobias L. Roß, Kai C. Wollert, Jens P. Bankstahl, Johann Bauersachs, Thorsten Derlin, Rob Beanlands, Jean N. DaSilva, Annika Hess and Georg Berding. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging and Biology and European Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact