James T. Thackeray

3.1k citations
83 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

James T. Thackeray

78 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

James T. Thackeray
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 955
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 831
  • Oncology 403
  • Neurology 79
  • Cancer Research 139
Replace Masatoshi Ishibashi with:
Masatoshi Ishibashi Japan
Frances L. Johnson United States
Nobuhiro Tahara Japan
Jan Bucerius Germany
Timm Dickfeld United States
Masazumi Arai Japan
Masanori Ozaki Japan
Jason M. Tarkin United Kingdom
Götz Münch Germany
Fabrice Prunier France
James T. Thackeray relative to Masatoshi Ishibashi Japan Masatoshi Ishibashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Masatoshi Ishibashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Thackeray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Thackeray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Thackeray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Thackeray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Thackeray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Thackeray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Thackeray. The network helps show where James T. Thackeray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James T. Thackeray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James T. Thackeray Line = papers co-authored together James T. Thackeray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018222
2 2015146
3 201796
4 202277
5 202063
6 201860
7 201655
8 201154
9 201752
10 201848
11 201446
12 201446
13 201445
14 201242
15 201641
16 202035
17 201933
18 200733
19 202031
20 201731

About James T. Thackeray

James T. Thackeray is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (26 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (21 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (17 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (11 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (11 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (9 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (955 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (831 citations), Oncology (403 citations), Neurology (79 citations) and Cancer Research (139 citations). James T. Thackeray has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank M. Bengel, Tobias L. Roß, Kai C. Wollert, Jens P. Bankstahl, Johann Bauersachs, Thorsten Derlin, Rob Beanlands, Jean N. DaSilva, Annika Hess and Georg Berding. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging and Biology and European Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact