James Stone

881 citations
32 papers · 714 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James Stone

32 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers

James Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 595
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 167
  • Spectroscopy 284
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 60
  • Biophysics 23
Replace H.‐H. Ritze with:
H.‐H. Ritze Germany
John Krenos United States
C. Tric France
Sergei D. Ivanov Germany
C. Kalpouzos Greece
Gennady Mil’nikov Japan
R. P. Frueholz United States
Alvin Penner Canada
C. Rauscher United States
J. Chesnoy France
James Stone relative to H.‐H. Ritze Germany H.‐H. Ritze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
H.‐H. Ritze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Stone. The network helps show where James Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside James Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Stone Line = papers co-authored together James Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197995
2 197664
3 197957
4 197655
5 197343
6 198040
7 198130
8 197927
9 197327
10 198026
11 197624
12 197524
13 198024
14 197520
15 198119
16 197818
17 197918
18 198018
19 197615
20 198014

About James Stone

James Stone is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (17 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (13 papers), Laser Design and Applications (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (8 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (5 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (595 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (167 citations), Spectroscopy (284 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60 citations) and Biophysics (23 citations). James Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Myron F. Goodman, Everett Thiele, David A. Dows, John C. Stephenson, David S. King, J. A. Horsley, Stephen E. Bialkowski, Jean‐Claude Diels, Kenneth G. Kay and G. Rakowsky. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Optical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact