James Roe
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 10
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 5
- Co-authors
- Fiona Ng (8 shared papers)Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone (8 shared papers)Mike Slade (8 shared papers)Joy Llewellyn‐Beardsley (8 shared papers)Kristian Pollock (6 shared papers)Ada Hui (7 shared papers)Caroline Fox Yeo (7 shared papers)Graham Thornicroft (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)Journal of Mental Health (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
James Roe
19 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Applied Psychology 65
- General Health Professions 118
- Clinical Psychology 62
- Social Psychology 20
- Psychiatry and Mental health 16
Countries citing papers authored by James Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of James Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Roe. The network helps show where James Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | Physical and mental health benefits of participation in forest school. | 2009 | 8 |
| 11 | INCRESE: Development of an Inventory to Characterize Recorded Mental Health Recovery Narratives. | 2020 | 8 |
| 12 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2026 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About James Roe
James Roe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 20 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper) and Gender, Health, and Social Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (65 citations), General Health Professions (118 citations), Clinical Psychology (62 citations), Social Psychology (20 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (16 citations). James Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Ng, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Mike Slade, Joy Llewellyn‐Beardsley, Kristian Pollock, Ada Hui, Caroline Fox Yeo, Graham Thornicroft, Rose McGranahan and Julie Repper. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Mental Health and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.