James Roe
Impact in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health, psychology, and well-being
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 7
- Child and Adolescent Health 1
-
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 2
- Co-authors
- Fiona Ng (8 shared papers)Mike Slade (8 shared papers)Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone (8 shared papers)Ada Hui (7 shared papers)Joy Llewellyn‐Beardsley (7 shared papers)Caroline Yeo (7 shared papers)Kristian Pollock (6 shared papers)Rose McGranahan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)Journal of Mental Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
James Roe
15 papers receiving 191 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Applied Psychology 19
- General Health Professions 71
- Clinical Psychology 49
- Social Psychology 28
- Philosophy 15
Countries citing papers authored by James Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of James Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Roe. The network helps show where James Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 8 | Physical and mental health benefits of participation in forest school. | 2009 | 7 |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | INCRESE: Development of an Inventory to Characterize Recorded Mental Health Recovery Narratives. | 2020 | 6 |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 |
About James Roe
James Roe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (19 citations), General Health Professions (71 citations), Clinical Psychology (49 citations), Social Psychology (28 citations) and Philosophy (15 citations). James Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Ng, Mike Slade, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Ada Hui, Joy Llewellyn‐Beardsley, Caroline Yeo, Kristian Pollock, Rose McGranahan, Graham Thornicroft and Julie Repper. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Trials and Journal of Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.