James Riding

41 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

James Riding
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 82
  • Geography, Planning and Development 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 87
  • Clinical Psychology 90
  • Philosophy 45
Replace Phyllis Marynick Palmer with:
Phyllis Marynick Palmer United States
Reiner W. Dahlbender Germany
J.R.T. Davidson United States
Hans Doerr United States
Rhonda J. Moore United States
Jennifer Harvey United Kingdom
Chihiro Matsumoto Japan
Nina Ebner Austria
Henrik Flyger Denmark
Karen Severud Cook United States
James Riding relative to Phyllis Marynick Palmer United States Phyllis Marynick Palmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Phyllis Marynick Palmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Riding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Riding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Riding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Riding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Riding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Riding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Riding. The network helps show where James Riding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Riding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Riding Line = papers co-authored together James Riding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975125
2 197543
3 196131
4 196026
5 196326
6 202318
7 196115
8 195514
9 196014
10 195713
11 197410
12 202210
13 201610
14 20159
15 20239
16 20178
17 20208
18 20208
19 20158
20 20248

About James Riding

James Riding is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Cultural Studies, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anthropology and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Balkans: History, Politics, Society (6 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (6 papers), Medical History and Innovations (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (82 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (90 citations) and Philosophy (45 citations). James Riding has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Munro, JOHN W. DUNDEE, DAVID W. BARRON, John S. Robinson, T. Cecil Gray, Kirsi Pauliina Kallio, Carl T. Dahlman, Alastair Bonnett, Jennifer M. Hunter and David A. Price Evans. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Fennia, Dialogues in Human Geography, Cultural Geographies and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact