James Q. Smith

1.1k citations
17 papers · 591 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Q. Smith

15 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

James Q. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Management Science and Operations Research 93
  • Artificial Intelligence 233
  • Statistics and Probability 52
  • Plant Science 226
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Seung‐Ho Kang with:
Seung‐Ho Kang South Korea
C.M. Triggs New Zealand
Sophie Lèbre France
Wenguang Sun United States
Wolfgang Polasek Switzerland
Jianhua Guo China
Daniel A. Henderson United Kingdom
Daniel J. Nordman United States
Vahid Partovi Nia Canada
Yuying Jia China
James Q. Smith relative to Seung‐Ho Kang South Korea Seung‐Ho Kang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Seung‐Ho Kang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Q. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Q. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Q. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Q. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Q. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Q. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Q. Smith. The network helps show where James Q. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James Q. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Q. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Q. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006257
2 1991160
3 199144
4 198943
5 201423
6 201123
7 199212
8 201511
9 20186
10 20103
11 20032
12 20242
13 20122
14 19842
15 19831
16
Multiagent Bayesian Forecasting of Time Series with Graphical Models
20090
17 20050

About James Q. Smith

James Q. Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (2 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (1 paper) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (93 citations), Artificial Intelligence (233 citations), Statistics and Probability (52 citations), Plant Science (226 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). James Q. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Oliver, Paul Goodwin, Martin Straume, James Locke, James R. Lynn, Andrew J. Millar, Anthony Hall, Paul E. Anderson, Kieron D. Edwards and Neeraj Salathia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Operational Research Society, Electronic Journal of Statistics, Annals of Operations Research, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning and The Annals of Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact