James Pine

848 citations
22 papers · 532 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James Pine

22 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

James Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Transplantation 75
  • Hepatology 113
  • Oncology 240
  • Surgery 281
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
Replace Naoki Tanimine with:
Naoki Tanimine Japan
A. Şengül Türkiye
Gerold Becker Germany
Marie‐Hélène Delbouille Belgium
Ferguson Rm United States
Shu-Huey Chen Taiwan
Yoshitaka Momose Australia
L. C. Paul Netherlands
Ane Miren Andrés Spain
Farhad Sahebjam United States
James Pine relative to Naoki Tanimine Japan Naoki Tanimine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Naoki Tanimine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pine. The network helps show where James Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pine Line = papers co-authored together James Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009117
2 2015103
3 201287
4 200957
5 199539
6 201020
7 202014
8 202213
9 201012
10 201011
11 201411
12 20109
13 20108
14 20106
15 20095
16 20195
17 20104
18 20104
19 20103
20
Non-invasive semi-quantitative measurements of tidal pressure-volume and flow relations of lung in COPD patients.
19842

About James Pine

James Pine is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Transplantation and Hepatology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (9 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (7 papers), Stoma care and complications (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (75 citations), Hepatology (113 citations), Oncology (240 citations), Surgery (281 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations). James Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Rajendra Prasad, Gordon Hutchins, Philip Quirke, Magdy Attia, Stephen Pollard, David Jayne, Nicholas P. West, Eva Morris, Mervyn H. Davies and J.P.A. Lodge. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Behavior and Immunity, British Journal of Cancer, Surgical Endoscopy, Clinical Anatomy and Gut.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact