James Peña

447 citations
11 papers · 363 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Parasitology top 10%
    • Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
    • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Papers in

    • Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments 2
    • Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies 3
    • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics 2

James Peña

10 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

James Peña
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ophthalmology 161
  • Parasitology 61
  • Pharmaceutical Science 25
  • Immunology and Allergy 13
  • Neurology 18
Replace Murali Subramani with:
Murali Subramani India
Ponnalagu Murugeswari India
Yong‐Soo Byun South Korea
Yangyan Xiao China
Kristine Porter United States
Yashar Seyed‐Razavi United States
DAVID A. LEE United States
Hideki Fukuoka Japan
David Salom Spain
James Peña relative to Murali Subramani India Murali Subramani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Murali Subramani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Peña

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Peña more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Peña

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Peña. The network helps show where James Peña may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Peña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Peña Line = papers co-authored together James Peña links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1999126
2
Increased elastin expression in astrocytes of the lamina cribrosa in response to elevated intraocular pressure.
200193
3 199043
4 200934
5 200621
6 201918
7 201012
8 20018
9 20095
10 19963
11 20230

About James Peña

James Peña is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Parasitology, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (3 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (1 paper), Paraquat toxicity studies and treatments (1 paper), Drilling and Well Engineering (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (161 citations), Parasitology (61 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (25 citations), Immunology and Allergy (13 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). James Peña has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. Rosario Hernandez, Cynthia S. Ricard, Andrew W. Taylor, Mark J. Lucarelli, Olga A. Agapova, B’Ann T. Gabelt, Leonard A. Levin, P.L. Kaufman, James B. Field and Eloísa Amália Vieira Ferro. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, Metabolism, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Biochemical Society Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact