James Pemberton

53 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

James Pemberton
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 284
  • Public Administration 30
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 62
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 119
  • Accounting 55
Replace Giovanni Luzzi with:
Giovanni Luzzi Italy
Benjamin Aaron United States
Harvey J. Tucker United States
Francisco Marcos Spain
Eli Segal Canada
Kaushik Bhattacharya India
Michael C. Webb United States
Joshua Rosenbaum United States
Pere Pascual i Domènech Spain
Cláudia Furtado Portugal
James Pemberton relative to Giovanni Luzzi Italy Giovanni Luzzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Giovanni Luzzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pemberton. The network helps show where James Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pemberton Line = papers co-authored together James Pemberton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198861
2 200544
3 200543
4 200736
5 201431
6 200622
7 201622
8 199618
9 199316
10 199916
11 201115
12 201415
13 199214
14 200013
15 201613
16 198112
17 197411
18 200510
19 200410
20 200410

About James Pemberton

James Pemberton is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 56 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (11 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Economic theories and models (8 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (284 citations), Public Administration (30 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (62 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (119 citations) and Accounting (55 citations). James Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Sahn, Xiaokui Li, Tom Kai Ming Wang, Antoinette Kenny, Jamie Voss, Greg Gamble, Nicholas Kang, Tom Kai Ming Wang, Mary S. Minette and Crispin H. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, International Journal of Cardiology and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact