James Park

114 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 284
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 603
  • History and Philosophy of Science 74
  • Artificial Intelligence 380
  • Anthropology 53
Replace Terrence L. Fine with:
Terrence L. Fine United States
David E. Meltzer United States
Henri Poincaré United States
Myron Tribus United States
Kevin T. Kelly United States
Robert Louis Stevenson United States
Shigeru Nakayama Japan
H. L. Armstrong Canada
Roman Frigg United Kingdom
Judea Pearl United States
James Park relative to Terrence L. Fine United States Terrence L. Fine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Terrence L. Fine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Park. The network helps show where James Park may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Park, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Park Line = papers co-authored together James Park links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970119
2 196880
3 197754
4 201953
5 197049
6 197145
7 196845
8
In search of I/O-optimal recovery from disk failures
201138
9 197136
10 196828
11 201127
12 197927
13 201226
14 197624
15 197620
16 202120
17 200520
18 200518
19 201317
20 197716

About James Park

James Park is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Anthropology, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (30 papers), Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (27 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (13 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (13 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (12 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (11 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (10 papers) and Color Science and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (284 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (603 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (74 citations), Artificial Intelligence (380 citations) and Anthropology (53 citations). James Park has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include William Band, Henry Margenau, William J. Lehr, Steven Jige Quan, Athanassios Economou, Hwa‐Young Jeong, Sugie Lee, Randal Burns, Cheng Huang and John Shore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, Review of Progress in Coloration and Related Topics, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, Foundations of Physics and Coloration Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact