James P. Mudd
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Fire effects on ecosystems
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Ecology top 10%
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Papers in
- Ecology 5
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 4
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 2
- Co-authors
- Laura Bourgeau‐Chavez (2 shared papers)Matthew R. Dzialak (5 shared papers)Seth M. Harju (4 shared papers)Jeffrey B. Winstead (4 shared papers)Stephen L. Webb (4 shared papers)Eric S. Kasischke (1 shared paper)Annett Frick (1 shared paper)Kevin B. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Landscape Ecology (2 papers)International Journal of Remote Sensing (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Wildlife Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James P. Mudd
7 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Global and Planetary Change 171
- Ecology 193
- Environmental Engineering 95
- Environmental Chemistry 48
- Ecological Modeling 13
Countries citing papers authored by James P. Mudd
This map shows the geographic impact of James P. Mudd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James P. Mudd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James P. Mudd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James P. Mudd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James P. Mudd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James P. Mudd. The network helps show where James P. Mudd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside James P. Mudd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 2 |
About James P. Mudd
James P. Mudd is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (2 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (1 paper), Soil erosion and sediment transport (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (171 citations), Ecology (193 citations), Environmental Engineering (95 citations), Environmental Chemistry (48 citations) and Ecological Modeling (13 citations). James P. Mudd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Laura Bourgeau‐Chavez, Matthew R. Dzialak, Seth M. Harju, Jeffrey B. Winstead, Stephen L. Webb, Eric S. Kasischke, Annett Frick, Kevin B. Smith, Larry D. Hayden‐Wing and E. S. Kasischke. Their work appears in journals such as Landscape Ecology, International Journal of Remote Sensing, PLoS ONE and Wildlife Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.