James North

1.2k citations
23 papers · 685 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James North

20 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

James North
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 408
  • Pharmacology 319
  • Neurology 116
  • Physiology 231
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 135
Replace Shihab Ahmed with:
Shihab Ahmed United States
Randall P. Brewer United States
Michael Hanes United States
Connail McCrory Ireland
Stefan Schu Germany
Elias Veizi United States
Eric Grigsby United States
J. Altmeppen Germany
Anders D. Kristensen Denmark
Athina Vadalouca Greece
James North relative to Shihab Ahmed United States Shihab Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Shihab Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James North

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James North's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James North with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James North more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James North

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James North. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James North. The network helps show where James North may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James North, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James North Line = papers co-authored together James North links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201388
2 200970
3 201668
4 201666
5 200965
6 201264
7 199356
8 201240
9 201933
10 201527
11 201627
12 201424
13 202016
14 201515
15 202111
16 20238
17 20253
18 20152
19 20221
20 20121

About James North

James North is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (12 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers) and Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (408 citations), Pharmacology (319 citations), Neurology (116 citations), Physiology (231 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (135 citations). James North has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard Rauck, Leonardo Kapural, Christopher A Gilmore, Steven P. Cohen, Joseph W. Boggs, Mark S. Wallace, Allen W. Burton, Ignacio Tagarro, A. L. Finn and Ryan C. Rauck. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Pain Practice, Pain Medicine, Journal of Pain and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact