James Moor

27 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

James Moor
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Otorhinolaryngology 102
  • Speech and Hearing 29
  • Sensory Systems 10
  • Nephrology 13
  • Surgery 78
Replace Rickul Varshney with:
Rickul Varshney Canada
William D. DeHoff United States
Masakazu Gotoh Japan
J.D. Newell United States
G.A. Charlton United Kingdom
Meghann L. Kaiser United States
Jeff Hall United States
Adam Margalit United States
Giacomo Cester Italy
Bradford W. Lee United States
James Moor relative to Rickul Varshney Canada Rickul Varshney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Rickul Varshney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Moor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Moor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Moor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Moor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Moor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Moor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Moor. The network helps show where James Moor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Moor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Moor Line = papers co-authored together James Moor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201041
2 200427
3 200421
4 200820
5 202317
6 201015
7 201515
8 201714
9 201513
10 201013
11 202110
12 200610
13 20108
14 20198
15 20097
16 20197
17 20047
18 20146
19 20136
20 20056

About James Moor

James Moor is a scholar working on Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 31 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases (3 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (2 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2 papers) and Soft Robotics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (102 citations), Speech and Hearing (29 citations), Sensory Systems (10 citations), Nephrology (13 citations) and Surgery (78 citations). James Moor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vinidh Paleri, C. Kelly, Ken MacLennan, A. P. Coatesworth, C.F. Johnston, Joanne Patterson, Jemy Jose, Sumit Sood, Joanne Patterson and Patrick Murray. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Otolaryngology, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact