James M Wright

8 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

James M Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Family Practice 19
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 33
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 86
  • General Health Professions 94
  • Pharmacology 30
Replace Julien Dedier with:
Julien Dedier United States
Rafael V. Picon Brazil
A. Wessling Sweden
Omar Thanoon Dawood Malaysia
Andrew Boyden Australia
Robert J. Cluxton United States
Jacqueline S. Marinac United States
Svetla Gadzhanova Australia
Andrew D. Schreiner United States
Xueke Bai China
James M Wright relative to Julien Dedier United States Julien Dedier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Julien Dedier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M Wright. The network helps show where James M Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James M Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M Wright Line = papers co-authored together James M Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2003117
2
Systematic review of antihypertensive therapies: does the evidence assist in choosing a first-line drug?
199992
3 198250
4
Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 1: Thiazide diuretics.
200016
5 199812
6 20239
7 20058
8
Asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. Rapid answers using the Cochrane Library.
20023

About James M Wright

James M Wright is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (19 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (33 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (86 citations), General Health Professions (94 citations) and Pharmacology (30 citations). James M Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chang‐Hoon Lee, Vincent P. Sweeney, Colin R. Dormuth, J Wakefield, Malcolm Maclure, Carol P. Herbert, Pamela Brett-MacLean, Bruce Carleton, Mahyar Etminan and Rachel M. Shaffer. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Research, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Annals of Pharmacotherapy and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact