James M. Parrish

951 citations
74 papers · 664 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James M. Parrish

68 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

James M. Parrish
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 177
  • Otorhinolaryngology 26
  • Surgery 173
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 22
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 11
Replace Nafiseh Vahed with:
Nafiseh Vahed Iran
Ignacio Araya Chile
Norman R. Bohidar United States
Andro Košec Croatia
Ravleen Nagi India
Nıhat Akbulut Türkiye
Alfonso Fiorello Italy
Thomas Hitchcock United States
Mohammed Algarni Saudi Arabia
Bing Guo Canada
James M. Parrish relative to Nafiseh Vahed Iran Nafiseh Vahed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Nafiseh Vahed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Parrish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Parrish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Parrish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Parrish. The network helps show where James M. Parrish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. Parrish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M. Parrish Line = papers co-authored together James M. Parrish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202143
2 202040
3 201736
4 201829
5 202028
6 202028
7 202124
8 202019
9 201619
10 202016
11 201916
12 201915
13 202014
14 202013
15 201912
16 201712
17 202012
18 202111
19 202011
20 202011

About James M. Parrish

James M. Parrish is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Political Science and International Relations and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (20 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (11 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (2 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (2 papers), Intellectual Property Rights and Media (2 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (177 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (26 citations), Surgery (173 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (22 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (11 citations). James M. Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Kern Singh, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Thomas S. Brundage, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Elliot D.K., Conor P. Lynch, Rahul Mittal and Joon S. Yoo. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication, The International Journal of Spine Surgery, Neurospine, Spine and The Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact