James Lies
Impact in
-
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Papers in
-
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies 3
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 2
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health 2
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 1
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes 1
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology 2
- Co-authors
- Dean T. Mason (6 shared papers)James F. King (2 shared papers)Anthony N. DeMaria (2 shared papers)Joseph A. Bonanno (2 shared papers)Hugo G. Bogren (1 shared paper)Ezra A. Amsterdam (6 shared papers)Robert Zelis (3 shared papers)David O. Williams (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Cardiology (4 papers)Circulation (2 papers)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)The American Journal of Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Lies
8 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 359
- Complementary and alternative medicine 55
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 90
- Internal Medicine 13
- Surgery 119
Countries citing papers authored by James Lies
This map shows the geographic impact of James Lies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Lies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Lies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Lies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Lies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Lies. The network helps show where James Lies may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside James Lies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1974 | 178 | |
| 2 | 1974 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 2 |
About James Lies
James Lies is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (359 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (55 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (90 citations), Internal Medicine (13 citations) and Surgery (119 citations). James Lies has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dean T. Mason, James F. King, Anthony N. DeMaria, Joseph A. Bonanno, Hugo G. Bogren, Ezra A. Amsterdam, Robert Zelis, David O. Williams, Jorge Otero and Richard R. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Circulation, Annals of Internal Medicine and The American Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.