James L. Congleton

32 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers

James L. Congleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Aquatic Science 515
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 495
  • Physiology 109
  • Immunology 419
  • Ecology 460
Replace Deguo Yang with:
Deguo Yang China
Jane E. Symonds New Zealand
D. Stewart Fielder Australia
Sílvio Peixoto Brazil
Clyde S. Tamaru United States
J.F. Wickins Canada
SC Battaglene Australia
W. Linn Montgomery United States
Colleen A. Caldwell United States
Norma G. Ginther Canada
James L. Congleton relative to Deguo Yang China Deguo Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Deguo Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Congleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Congleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Congleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Congleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Congleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Congleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Congleton. The network helps show where James L. Congleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James L. Congleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. Congleton Line = papers co-authored together James L. Congleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004162
2 2006148
3 2012111
4 200290
5 200073
6 198044
7 200542
8 200641
9 200139
10 201539
11 199133
12 200332
13 200628
14 197426
15 198425
16 200421
17 200820
18 200219
19 200514
20 199012

About James L. Congleton

James L. Congleton is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Immunology and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (12 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (6 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (5 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (515 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (495 citations), Physiology (109 citations), Immunology (419 citations) and Ecology (460 citations). James L. Congleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tyler Wagner, Thomas L. Welker, Lawrence E. Davis, Eric J. Wagner, Carl B. Schreck, G. R. Jones, Benjamin R. LaFrentz, Baoqing Sun, Kenneth D. Cain and Scott E. LaPatra. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, Journal of Fish Biology, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry and Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact