James L. Congleton

32 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

James L. Congleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Aquatic Science 531
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 510
  • Physiology 110
  • Immunology 432
  • Ecology 490
Replace Deguo Yang with:
Deguo Yang China
Robert G. Piper United States
D. Stewart Fielder Australia
Sílvio Peixoto Brazil
Massimo Lorenzoni Italy
J.F. Wickins Canada
Clyde S. Tamaru United States
Colleen A. Caldwell United States
J. Scott Foott United States
Kei’ichiro Iguchi Japan
James L. Congleton relative to Deguo Yang China Deguo Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Deguo Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Congleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Congleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Congleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Congleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Congleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Congleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Congleton. The network helps show where James L. Congleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James L. Congleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. Congleton Line = papers co-authored together James L. Congleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004166
2 2006153
3 2012121
4 200297
5 200074
6 198050
7 200543
8 201541
9 200641
10 200141
11 200334
12 199133
13 197431
14 198430
15 200628
16 200822
17 200421
18 200220
19 200515
20 199013

About James L. Congleton

James L. Congleton is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Immunology and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (12 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (6 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (5 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (531 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (510 citations), Physiology (110 citations), Immunology (432 citations) and Ecology (490 citations). James L. Congleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tyler Wagner, Thomas L. Welker, Lawrence E. Davis, Eric J. Wagner, Carl B. Schreck, Baoqing Sun, Kenneth D. Cain, Benjamin R. LaFrentz, Scott E. LaPatra and G. R. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Fish Biology, Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry and North American Journal of Fisheries Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact