James Kendall

952 citations
5 papers · 5 · h-index 2

Impact in

Papers in

    • Photography and Visual Culture 1
    • Medical History and Innovations 1
    • Historical and Literary Studies 1
Journals
Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric (1 paper)Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) (1 paper)Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
Partner nations
ItalyUnited States

In The Last Decade

James Kendall

4 papers receiving 4 citations

Peers

James Kendall
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
  • History 2
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1
Replace Patrick Abercrombie with:
Patrick Abercrombie
A. Wilmart
G. R. Owst
Penelope Mortimer
Francis L. Bacon United States
T Yasutomi Japan
D Ayral France
M. Delattre France
A.W. Reed
Donna Wallace United States
James Kendall relative to Patrick Abercrombie Patrick Abercrombie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Patrick Abercrombie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Kendall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kendall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kendall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kendall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kendall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kendall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kendall. The network helps show where James Kendall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside James Kendall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Kendall Line = papers co-authored together James Kendall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 19511
2 20201
3 19521
4
GREAT DISCOVERIES BY YOUNG CHEMISTS
20111
5
Humphry Davy: "Pilot" of Penzance
19541

About James Kendall

James Kendall is a scholar working on History, Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 5 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper), Medical History and Innovations (1 paper) and Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (2 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1 citation), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1 citation), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1 citation) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1 citation). James Kendall has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Robert Fearon. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric, Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew), Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact