James J. Smith

4.4k citations
87 papers · 3.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

    • Insect behavior and control techniques 19
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 13
    • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 5
    • Forest Insect Ecology and Management 24

James J. Smith

83 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

James J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Insect Science 602
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 512
  • Genetics 572
  • Ecology 494
  • Biochemistry 114
Replace R. C. Noble with:
R. C. Noble United Kingdom
David A. Jones United Kingdom
Claude Gagnon Canada
Bin Chen China
Christer Hansson Sweden
П. Карлсон Germany
James H. Thomas United States
Daniel Cohen New Zealand
Marie‐Anne Félix France
John Tower United States
James J. Smith relative to R. C. Noble United Kingdom R. C. Noble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
R. C. Noble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Smith. The network helps show where James J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003498
2 2003277
3 2002245
4 1992210
5 2009156
6 2009145
7 1996132
8 1984109
9 199799
10 201191
11 198685
12 199479
13 199865
14 201565
15 199060
16 198759
17 200854
18 201154
19 198948
20 198942

About James J. Smith

James J. Smith is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 87 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (24 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Evolution and Science Education (12 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (602 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (512 citations), Genetics (572 citations), Ecology (494 citations) and Biochemistry (114 citations). James J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Homme W. Hellinga, Mary A. Dwyer, Loren L. Looger, Guy L. Bush, Jeffrey L. Feder, Thomas J. Ebert, Jill A. Barney, Derek T. A. Lamport, Thomas H. Q. Powell and Andrew A. Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution Education and Outreach, Journal of Economic Entomology, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact