James Grimmelmann

920 citations
67 papers · 308 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Grimmelmann

56 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

James Grimmelmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Safety Research 52
  • Communication 29
  • Computer Science Applications 21
  • Marketing 29
Replace Yves Poullet with:
Yves Poullet Belgium
J.E.J. Prins Netherlands
Aaron Rieke United States
Lena Ulbricht Germany
Stephen Cory Robinson Sweden
Francesca Musiani France
Miranda Bogen United States
Joshua Fairfield United States
Zubin Jelveh United States
Joris van Hoboken Netherlands
James Grimmelmann relative to Yves Poullet Belgium Yves Poullet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Yves Poullet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Grimmelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Grimmelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Grimmelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Grimmelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Grimmelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Grimmelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Grimmelmann. The network helps show where James Grimmelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Grimmelmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Grimmelmann Line = papers co-authored together James Grimmelmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200529
2 200724
3 201723
4
Some Skepticism About Search Neutrality
201022
5 202021
6 202320
7
The Google Dilemma
200815
8 201910
9
Virtual World Feudalism
20098
10 20248
11 20248
12 20208
13 20177
14 20247
15
Dr. Generative Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Iphone
20106
16
How to Fix the Google Book Search Settlement
20096
17 20136
18 20175
19 20095
20 20184

About James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Law and Marketing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Copyright and Intellectual Property (11 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (11 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (9 papers), Digital Rights Management and Security (6 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (4 papers) and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (9 citations), Safety Research (52 citations), Communication (29 citations), Computer Science Applications (21 citations) and Marketing (29 citations). James Grimmelmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Feder Cooper, Katherine Lee, Donald Braman, Dan M. Kahan, Paul Ohm, Jack M. Balkin, Tal Zarsky, Ari Juels, Ittay Eyal and Karl Wüst. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Iowa law review, Fordham law review, Maryland law review and The Yale Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact