James Gilbert

815 citations
26 papers · 105 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

James Gilbert

20 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

James Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Instrumentation 76
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 48
  • Computational Mechanics 12
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 26
Replace David Loop with:
David Loop Canada
Scott Smedley Australia
Stan Miziarski Australia
Junichi Noumaru Japan
Robert Fata United States
Eszter Pozna Germany
S. Perruchot France
Luke Gers Australia
Jurek Brzeski Australia
I. Tallon-Bosc France
James Gilbert relative to David Loop Canada David Loop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
David Loop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Gilbert. The network helps show where James Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together James Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201418
2 201814
3 201213
4 201213
5 201411
6 20106
7 20145
8 20223
9 20123
10 20223
11 20143
12 20172
13
Explorations of American culture
20002
14 20222
15
The first SPIE software Hack Day
20161
16 20181
17 20241
18 20181
19 20161
20 20201

About James Gilbert

James Gilbert is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 105 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (3 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers) and Optical Network Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (76 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (56 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (48 citations), Computational Mechanics (12 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (26 citations). James Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Lewis Waller, Peter Gillingham, Jurek Brzeski, Greg Smith, Rolf Müller, Michael Goodwin, Will Saunders, Scott Smedley, W. Saunders and Jeroen Heijmans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems, Journal of Hydrology, American Quarterly, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and History of Education Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact