James Geer

1.3k citations
71 papers · 947 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James Geer

70 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers

James Geer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Numerical Analysis 114
  • Modeling and Simulation 67
  • Computational Mechanics 276
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 126
  • Applied Mathematics 69
Replace Xiu Yang with:
Xiu Yang United States
S. M. Roberts United States
Zabidin Salleh Malaysia
A. Charafi United Kingdom
Syed Muslim Shah Pakistan
Robert M. M. Mattheij Netherlands
J. S. Shipman United States
Karel Rektorys Czechia
K. Sobczyk Poland
Prem K. Kythe United States
James Geer relative to Xiu Yang United States Xiu Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Xiu Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Geer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Geer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Geer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Geer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Geer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Geer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Geer. The network helps show where James Geer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James Geer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Geer Line = papers co-authored together James Geer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198272
2 198462
3 199261
4 201549
5 200033
6 200729
7 197328
8 199728
9 201427
10 197525
11 198325
12 199525
13 197624
14 201124
15 201423
16 201418
17 198918
18 196818
19 199015
20 197815

About James Geer

James Geer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis and Materials Chemistry, having authored 71 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat Transfer and Optimization (17 papers), Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies (12 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (11 papers), Thermal properties of materials (9 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (9 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (7 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (7 papers) and Scientific Research and Discoveries (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (114 citations), Modeling and Simulation (67 citations), Computational Mechanics (276 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (126 citations) and Applied Mathematics (69 citations). James Geer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Romania. Frequent co-authors include C. M. Andersen, Bahgat Sammakia, Tianyi Gao, George J. Klir, Joseph B. Keller, John C. Strikwerda, Roger Schmidt, Timothy J. Singler, Milnes P. David and Bruce T. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Journal of Electronic Packaging and Journal of Scientific Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact