James Field

819 citations
41 papers · 661 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James Field

37 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

James Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 329
  • Spectroscopy 335
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 384
  • Biophysics 79
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 105
Replace A.F. Mehlkopf with:
A.F. Mehlkopf Netherlands
H. R. Brooker United States
J. Brondeau France
J. H. N. Creyghton Netherlands
P K Grannell United Kingdom
Yoav Shrot Israel
D. M. Doddrell Australia
L. J. Burnett United States
Daniel Marek Switzerland
Joel F Martin United States
James Field relative to A.F. Mehlkopf Netherlands A.F. Mehlkopf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
A.F. Mehlkopf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Field Line = papers co-authored together James Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198674
2 198667
3 198153
4 198649
5 199145
6 198338
7 199226
8 198625
9 198423
10 198722
11 197321
12
Use of high resolution in vivo volume selected 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate leukemia in humans.
198719
13 199016
14 198916
15 198713
16 198713
17 198411
18 198711
19 199010
20 198410

About James Field

James Field is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 41 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (14 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (8 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (5 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (329 citations), Spectroscopy (335 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (384 citations), Biophysics (79 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (105 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David M. Doddrell, William M. Brooks, Michael G. Irving, J.Mark Bulsing, Ian M. Brereton, H Baddeley, Graham J. Galloway, ‪Stuart Crozier‬, M.Robin Bendall and David T. Pegg. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Optics Express, The Medical Journal of Australia and Optics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact