James Eaden

474 citations
21 papers · 298 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Eaden

21 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

James Eaden
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 117
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 90
  • Genetics 64
  • Spectroscopy 37
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
Replace Clemens Wirth with:
Clemens Wirth Germany
Jonathan H. Rayment Canada
G. Metz United States
Barbara A. Lutey United States
Usha Deshpande United States
Kosuke Okamoto Japan
Goffredo Serra Italy
Virginia Nguyen France
Gary W. Thomas United States
Jiaqi Fan China
James Eaden relative to Clemens Wirth Germany Clemens Wirth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Clemens Wirth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Eaden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Eaden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Eaden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Eaden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Eaden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Eaden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Eaden. The network helps show where James Eaden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Eaden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Eaden Line = papers co-authored together James Eaden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200382
2 201953
3 202140
4 202038
5 202017
6 202217
7 20229
8 20238
9 20226
10 20206
11 20134
12 20203
13 20193
14 20193
15 20202
16 20192
17 20251
18 20201
19 20191
20 20201

About James Eaden

James Eaden is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (15 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (7 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1 paper) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (117 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (90 citations), Genetics (64 citations), Spectroscopy (37 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations). James Eaden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jim M. Wild, Stephen Bianchi, Nicholas Weatherley, Neil J. Stewart, Andrew J. Swift, Guilhem Collier, Paul Hughes, Brian J. Bartholmai, Laurie Smith and Helen Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as ERJ Open Research, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Thorax, Annals of Human Genetics and European Respiratory Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact