James Eaden

450 citations
20 papers · 275 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Eaden

20 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

James Eaden
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 111
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 109
  • Genetics 74
  • Spectroscopy 43
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 57
Replace Clemens Wirth with:
Clemens Wirth Germany
Jonathan H. Rayment Canada
C. Towe United States
Goffredo Serra Italy
Anders Waage Norway
Daniel Álvarez United States
David J. Mossa United States
Usha Deshpande Canada
M Ahmad United States
Virginia Nguyen France
James Eaden relative to Clemens Wirth Germany Clemens Wirth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Clemens Wirth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Eaden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Eaden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Eaden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Eaden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Eaden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Eaden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Eaden. The network helps show where James Eaden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Eaden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Eaden Line = papers co-authored together James Eaden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200381
2 201947
3 202138
4 202034
5 202017
6 202216
7 20237
8 20227
9 20205
10 20134
11 20224
12 20193
13 20193
14 20202
15 20192
16 20251
17 20201
18 20191
19 20201
20 20201

About James Eaden

James Eaden is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (8 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (111 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (109 citations), Genetics (74 citations), Spectroscopy (43 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (57 citations). James Eaden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jim M. Wild, Stephen Bianchi, Nicholas Weatherley, Neil J. Stewart, Andrew J. Swift, Guilhem Collier, Paul Hughes, Brian J. Bartholmai, Laurie Smith and Nathan J. O’Callaghan. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ERJ Open Research, Thorax, Scientific Reports and Annals of Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact