James E. McClure

1.9k citations
84 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James E. McClure

71 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

James E. McClure
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Algebra and Number Theory 325
  • Mathematical Physics 621
  • Geometry and Topology 543
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 51
  • Marketing 81
Replace Richard H. Steinberg with:
Richard H. Steinberg United States
James Alexander Türkiye
David Cook Hong Kong
Steven E. Landsburg United States
D. B. Lahiri India
Richard B. Sher United States
Jin Chen China
Moshé Machover United Kingdom
Graham Hall United Kingdom
William Hatcher United States
James E. McClure relative to Richard H. Steinberg United States Richard H. Steinberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.5×
Richard H. Steinberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. McClure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. McClure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. McClure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. McClure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. McClure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. McClure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. McClure. The network helps show where James E. McClure may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. McClure, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. McClure Line = papers co-authored together James E. McClure links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986119
2 199286
3 200381
4 199269
5 199357
6 199257
7 198145
8 200433
9 199330
10 200529
11 199528
12 197228
13 199725
14 196725
15 196623
16 200620
17 198918
18 200417
19 199416
20 198615

About James E. McClure

James E. McClure is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (23 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (15 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (15 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (14 papers), Economic theories and models (12 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (5 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (325 citations), Mathematical Physics (621 citations), Geometry and Topology (543 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (51 citations) and Marketing (81 citations). James E. McClure has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Jackowski, Philip R. P. Coelho, Bob Oliver, J. P. May, Robert Bruner, Mark Steinberger, Jeffrey H. Smith, G. A. Rechnitz, J. S. Brinen and D. L. Maricle. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Bioeconomics, Lecture notes in mathematics, The Review of Austrian Economics and Topology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact