James E. Lies

592 citations
8 papers · 486 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Lies

8 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

James E. Lies
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 373
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 57
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 95
  • Internal Medicine 14
  • Surgery 130
Replace Duncan R. Coles with:
Duncan R. Coles United Kingdom
Dennis G. Caralis United States
Martin R. Berk United States
Helen J. Walsh New Zealand
Albert Alahmar United Kingdom
Richard J. Haskell United States
Khaled Albouaini United Kingdom
Melissa Leung Australia
Paul Gillette United States
A.J. Mourant United Kingdom
James E. Lies relative to Duncan R. Coles United Kingdom Duncan R. Coles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Duncan R. Coles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Lies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Lies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Lies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Lies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Lies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Lies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Lies. The network helps show where James E. Lies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James E. Lies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Lies Line = papers co-authored together James E. Lies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1974187
2 197483
3 197480
4 197555
5 197634
6 197323
7 197221
8 19733

About James E. Lies

James E. Lies is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Internal Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Physiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (1 paper) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (373 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (57 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (95 citations), Internal Medicine (14 citations) and Surgery (130 citations). James E. Lies has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dean T. Mason, James Forrester King, Anthony Nicholas DeMaria, Joseph A. Bonanno, Hugo G. Bogren, Ezra A. Amsterdam, ROBERT F. ZELIS, Jorge Miguel Otero, David O. Williams and Richard R. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Circulation, Annals of Internal Medicine and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact