James E. Hayes

29 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers

James E. Hayes
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 192
  • Sensory Systems 62
  • Nephrology 58
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 84
  • Insect Science 59
Replace João Cavaleiro Rufo with:
João Cavaleiro Rufo Portugal
A Sass-Kortsak Canada
Rolf Alexandersson Sweden
Frank Hoffmeyer Germany
Sarah Robertson United Kingdom
Robert Burns United States
Edward B. Barr United States
Maria Hammer Denmark
Hui Ding China
Urban Svedberg Sweden
James E. Hayes relative to João Cavaleiro Rufo Portugal João Cavaleiro Rufo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
João Cavaleiro Rufo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Hayes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Hayes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Hayes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Hayes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Hayes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Hayes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Hayes. The network helps show where James E. Hayes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Hayes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Hayes Line = papers co-authored together James E. Hayes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014105
2 199580
3 199662
4 201853
5 201848
6 201041
7 201741
8 201430
9 200430
10 201329
11 196427
12 201225
13 201721
14 202219
15
Modifiable lifestyle factors that could reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer in New Zealand.
201617
16 202013
17 200712
18 201510
19 20237
20 20197

About James E. Hayes

James E. Hayes is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (9 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (9 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (192 citations), Sensory Systems (62 citations), Nephrology (58 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (84 citations) and Insect Science (59 citations). James E. Hayes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Stuetz, Richard J. Stevenson, Mahesh Shrestha, Ruth M. Fisher, Hélène Volkoff, Chris Frampton, Ann Richardson, Shaojian Lin, Anthony L Jinks and Rajeev Singh. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Environmental Management, Gene, British Journal of Cancer and BMC Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact