James E. Gentile

1.0k citations
21 papers · 316 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Gentile

20 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

James E. Gentile
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Signal Processing 74
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 41
  • Insect Science 58
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 134
  • Aging 7
Replace Jing Peng with:
Jing Peng China
Jun-Wei Lin China
Taishin Kin Japan
Bree Cummins United States
Yuhao Wen China
Peter van der Putten Netherlands
Matthew D. Rasmussen United States
Sara Ricci Czechia
Pavol Bauer Sweden
Kathleen B. McKusick United States
James E. Gentile relative to Jing Peng China Jing Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Jing Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Gentile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Gentile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Gentile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Gentile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Gentile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Gentile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Gentile. The network helps show where James E. Gentile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Gentile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Gentile Line = papers co-authored together James E. Gentile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201674
2 201363
3 201530
4 200928
5 200925
6 201324
7 201422
8 201016
9 20107
10 20177
11 20105
12 20084
13 20103
14 20122
15 20241
16
CAN YOU GET THERE FROM HERE
19831
17
Development, verification and usage of a model for the primary vector for malaria
20131
18 20111
19 20071
20 20161

About James E. Gentile

James E. Gentile is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science, Signal Processing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (4 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (74 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (41 citations), Insect Science (58 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (134 citations) and Aging (7 citations). James E. Gentile has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Samuel S. C. Rund, Nalini Ratha, Jonathan H. Connell, Giles E. Duffield, Aidan J. O’Donnell, Sarah E. Reece, Gregory R. Madey, Gregory J. Davis, Ying Zhou and Ruud M. Bolle. Their work appears in journals such as Malaria Journal, BMC Genomics, Insects, Review of Development Economics and Computational Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact