James E. Dobson

20 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

James E. Dobson
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Information Systems and Management 46
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Computer Networks and Communications 74
  • Safety Research 24
  • Information Systems 60
Replace Sergio Rabellino with:
Sergio Rabellino Italy
Ella Rabinovich Israel
Katherine Lee United States
Chelse Swoopes United States
Drahomíra Herrmannová United States
Elli Mylonas United States
Jenny T. Liang United States
Luca Soldaini United States
Suchin Gururangan United States
Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan United States
James E. Dobson relative to Sergio Rabellino Italy Sergio Rabellino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Sergio Rabellino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Dobson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Dobson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Dobson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Dobson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Dobson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Dobson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Dobson. The network helps show where James E. Dobson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James E. Dobson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Dobson Line = papers co-authored together James E. Dobson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202332
2 200431
3 200929
4 202423
5 200518
6 201916
7
Critical Digital Humanities: The Search for a Methodology
201914
8 201513
9 200511
10 201310
11 20196
12 20205
13 20194
14 20064
15 20243
16 20093
17 20052
18 20212
19 20231
20 20191

About James E. Dobson

James E. Dobson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Information Systems and Management, General Social Sciences, Computer Networks and Communications and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 25 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (6 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (46 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (74 citations), Safety Research (24 citations) and Information Systems (60 citations). James E. Dobson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include T. H. Jordan, Ian Foster, Yong Zhao, Michael Wilde, Suraj Pandey, William Voorsluys, Mustafizur Rahman, Rajkumar Buyya, Kenneth Chiu and Éric Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Configurations, College literature, The Mark Twain Annual, International review of neurobiology and Social Text.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact