James E. Cook

472 citations
26 papers · 348 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Cook

23 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

James E. Cook
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 155
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 52
  • Ecology 120
  • Environmental Chemistry 42
  • Global and Planetary Change 85
Replace David J. Schimpf with:
David J. Schimpf United States
Nicolas Schermann France
B. Krautzer Austria
Bert Van Gils Belgium
Rosario Fanlo Spain
Karen A. Stahlheber United States
Allan P. Drew United States
Robert van Hulst Canada
Eric Teissier Du Cros France
Janet Simkin United Kingdom
James E. Cook relative to David J. Schimpf United States David J. Schimpf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
David J. Schimpf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Cook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Cook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Cook. The network helps show where James E. Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Cook Line = papers co-authored together James E. Cook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200559
2 199839
3 201833
4 200322
5 199121
6 201220
7
Charles Sanders Peirce, Contributions to the Nation
197520
8 201919
9 200517
10 200413
11
200113
12 201812
13 201512
14
Contributions to The Nation. Part one : 1869-1893. Graduate Studies Texas Tech University, n° 10
197910
15 19987
16 19607
17 20086
18 20055
19 20214
20
Charles Sanders Peirce: Contributions to the Nation Part Three: 1901-1908
19863

About James E. Cook

James E. Cook is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 26 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (155 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (52 citations), Ecology (120 citations), Environmental Chemistry (42 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (85 citations). James E. Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Orr, Michael A. Bozek, Martin J. Jennings, Michael G. Newbrey, D. W. Smith, Terry L. Sharik, Kenneth Laine Ketner, R. A. Champion, Charles S. Peirce and Charles B. Halpern. Their work appears in journals such as Grass and Forage Science, Forest Ecology and Management, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, The American Archivist and Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact