James E. Byram

29 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

James E. Byram
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Parasitology 394
  • Ecology 136
  • Small Animals 42
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
  • Urology 14
Replace Chia‐Tung Pan with:
Chia‐Tung Pan United States
Rogério Tortelly Brazil
Betty June Myers United States
Donald V. Moore United States
Joseph J. DiConza United States
Eugene G. Hayunga United States
Ana R. Resendes Spain
S.Chia-tung Pan United States
Jerome L. Mahrt Canada
A. B. Chowdhury India
James E. Byram relative to Chia‐Tung Pan United States Chia‐Tung Pan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Chia‐Tung Pan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Byram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Byram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Byram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Byram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Byram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Byram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Byram. The network helps show where James E. Byram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Byram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Byram Line = papers co-authored together James E. Byram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197795
2 196750
3 197349
4 197947
5 198544
6 196734
7 198734
8 197933
9 198531
10 197429
11 197425
12 197623
13 198021
14 199121
15
Potentiation of schistosome granuloma formation. By lentinan--a T-cell adjuvant.
197920
16 198019
17 197815
18
Experimental infection with Schistosoma mekongi in laboratory animals: parasitological and pathological findings.
198012
19 198110
20 19719

About James E. Byram

James E. Byram is a scholar working on Parasitology, Small Animals, Ecology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Urology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasites and Host Interactions (19 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (7 papers), Helminth infection and control (5 papers), Parasitic infections in humans and animals (4 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (2 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper) and History of Science and Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (394 citations), Ecology (136 citations), Small Animals (42 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (46 citations) and Urology (14 citations). James E. Byram has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Franz von Lichtenberg, Frank M. Fisher, Richard D. Lumsden, Alfred W. Senft, Allen W. Cheever, Kathryn A. Hamilton, Alan Sher, Albert A. Gam, John Richard Seed and R. Musallam. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Journal of Parasitology, Tissue and Cell, Parasite Immunology and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact