James E. Ames

11 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

James E. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Transplantation 95
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 148
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
  • Hepatology 31
  • Physiology 95
Replace Christian Kowalski with:
Christian Kowalski Germany
Islam Abudayyeh United States
C. Créma Italy
Wei-Lung Chen Taiwan
Harald Reiter Germany
Yuerong Chen China
Krzysztof Oleś Poland
Gi‐Byoung Nam South Korea
Maciej Sosnowski Poland
Juan Carlos López‐Azor Spain
James E. Ames relative to Christian Kowalski Germany Christian Kowalski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Christian Kowalski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Ames. The network helps show where James E. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside James E. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Ames Line = papers co-authored together James E. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1998132
2 1995113
3 200080
4 199579
5 198119
6 199817
7
Professional attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation: results of a 1986-1987 survey of transplant professionals.
198811
8 19777
9
National Database for the Procurement and Transplantation of Non-Renal Organs.
19883
10
National Database for the Procurement and Transplantation of Kidneys
19873
11 19901

About James E. Ames

James E. Ames is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Transplantation, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (1 paper) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (95 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (148 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations), Hepatology (31 citations) and Physiology (95 citations). James E. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth W. Jones, Thomas G. Peters, Timothy R. Shaver, Eduardo A. Santiago‐Delpín, Dwain L. Eckberg, James F. Cox, William H. Cooke, Larry A. Beightol, Jeffrey B. Hoag and André Diedrich. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Naval Research Logistics (NRL), Computers in Biology and Medicine, Journal of Applied Physiology and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact