James E. Ames

11 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

James E. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Transplantation 133
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 162
  • Hepatology 48
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 41
  • Surgery 177
Replace João Roberto de Sá with:
João Roberto de Sá Brazil
Christopher W. White Canada
Sitaramesh Emani United States
T.M. Chou United States
Christian Kowalski Germany
Leonard W. Fabian United States
Simon P. Fynn United Kingdom
Dieter Zenker Germany
Islam Abudayyeh United States
R Cartier France
James E. Ames relative to João Roberto de Sá Brazil João Roberto de Sá's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
João Roberto de Sá · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Ames. The network helps show where James E. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside James E. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Ames Line = papers co-authored together James E. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1998126
2 1995113
3 199579
4 200068
5 199817
6 198115
7
Professional attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation: results of a 1986-1987 survey of transplant professionals.
198811
8 19777
9
National Database for the Procurement and Transplantation of Kidneys
19872
10
National Database for the Procurement and Transplantation of Non-Renal Organs.
19882
11 19901

About James E. Ames

James E. Ames is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Transplantation, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (1 paper), Optimization and Packing Problems (1 paper) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (133 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (162 citations), Hepatology (48 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (41 citations) and Surgery (177 citations). James E. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth W. Jones, Timothy R. Shaver, Thomas G. Peters, Eduardo A. Santiago‐Delpín, Dwain L. Eckberg, William H. Cooke, James F. Cox, Larry A. Beightol, Jeffrey B. Hoag and Henrik Seidel. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Naval Research Logistics (NRL), American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact