James E. Adams

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

James E. Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 708
  • Media Technology 312
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 656
  • Spectroscopy 225
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 370
Replace Kristina M. Johnson with:
Kristina M. Johnson United States
T. Carlsson Sweden
David B. Phillips United Kingdom
Don A. Gregory United States
Liyong Ren China
M. Sammon United States
Xiang Hao China
Sang-Hoon Kim South Korea
Tae-Geun Kim South Korea
Edward Watson United States
James E. Adams relative to Kristina M. Johnson United States Kristina M. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Kristina M. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Adams. The network helps show where James E. Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside James E. Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Adams Line = papers co-authored together James E. Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007200
2 1998191
3 1995154
4 1997148
5 1968137
6 196957
7 197456
8 197056
9 196954
10 197449
11 200246
12 197145
13 197445
14 196941
15 197040
16 197540
17 196934
18 197133
19 197829
20 200927

About James E. Adams

James E. Adams is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Molecular Biology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (26 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (10 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (7 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (6 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (5 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers) and Image and Signal Denoising Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (708 citations), Media Technology (312 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (656 citations), Spectroscopy (225 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (370 citations). James E. Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include W. Haas, J. J. WysŽòcki, Alan C. Bovik, Kenneth A. Parulski, Kevin E. Spaulding, Jeremy Flannery, R. R. Hewitt, K. D. Crow, Lewis B. Leder and Wei Hao. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact