James D. Driver
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 1
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Matthias C. Rillig (2 shared papers)William E. Holben (1 shared paper)Petra C. F. Oyston (1 shared paper)Clayton O. Jarrett (1 shared paper)B. Joseph Hinnebusch (1 shared paper)Roberto Rebeil (1 shared paper)Robert K. Ernst (1 shared paper)Vijay Gadkar (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Parasitology (1 paper)Journal of Bacteriology (1 paper)Biotechnology Letters (1 paper)Soil Biology and Biochemistry (1 paper)The Mathematics Enthusiast (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James D. Driver
5 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Soil Science 141
- Insect Science 117
- Plant Science 302
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 76
- Pollution 42
Countries citing papers authored by James D. Driver
This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Driver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Driver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Driver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Driver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Driver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Driver. The network helps show where James D. Driver may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside James D. Driver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 320 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 4 | The antibacterial immune response to Escherichia coli in the flea Xenopsylla cheopis | 2002 | 2 |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 |
About James D. Driver
James D. Driver is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Parasitology, Small Animals and Pharmacology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (1 paper), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper), Fungal Biology and Applications (1 paper), Vector-borne infectious diseases (1 paper) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (141 citations), Insect Science (117 citations), Plant Science (302 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (76 citations) and Pollution (42 citations). James D. Driver has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthias C. Rillig, William E. Holben, Petra C. F. Oyston, Clayton O. Jarrett, B. Joseph Hinnebusch, Roberto Rebeil, Robert K. Ernst, Vijay Gadkar, Fred A. Lewis and Matthew S. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Parasitology, Journal of Bacteriology, Biotechnology Letters, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and The Mathematics Enthusiast.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.