James D. Chang

2.6k citations
55 papers · 1.8k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

James D. Chang

52 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

James D. Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 509
  • Molecular Medicine 78
  • Molecular Biology 701
  • Microbiology 56
  • Genetics 228
Replace Keding Cheng with:
Keding Cheng Canada
Dar‐Chone Chow United States
Johannes D. Clausen Denmark
Lokesh Gakhar United States
Amitabha Deb United States
Wenjian Wang China
Patricio Gariglio Mexico
Carmine Mancone Italy
Edward N. Brody United States
Tapan K. Chaudhuri India
James D. Chang relative to Keding Cheng Canada Keding Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Keding Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Chang. The network helps show where James D. Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Chang Line = papers co-authored together James D. Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004289
2 1998148
3 2017144
4 2014142
5 2016103
6
Cytotoxic, cell cycle, and chromosomal effects of methylxanthines in human tumor cells treated with alkylating agents.
198690
7 200784
8 201277
9 199567
10 201563
11 200859
12 201549
13 201639
14 201434
15 201826
16 201724
17 201724
18 201622
19 200420
20 201718

About James D. Chang

James D. Chang is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (9 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (509 citations), Molecular Medicine (78 citations), Molecular Biology (701 citations), Microbiology (56 citations) and Genetics (228 citations). James D. Chang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Sung Joon Kim, Manmilan Singh, Peter Zimetbaum, Lewis C. Cantley, Warren J. Manning, Elisa Ebrille, Alex Toker, Jessica E. Hutti, Peter Störz and Benjamin E. Turk. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Biochemistry, The American Journal of Medicine, ESC Heart Failure and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact