James D. Bastable

3.2k citations
80 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 0.5%
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Philosophy, Science, and History

Papers in

    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 16
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 12
    • Study and Philosophy of Religion 9
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
    • Philosophical Thought and Analysis 9
Journals
Philosophical Studies (80 papers)

In The Last Decade

James D. Bastable

69 papers receiving 729 citations

James D. Bastable's Hit Papers

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1961 · 618 citations
6180+21+43Years since publication200400600

Peers

James D. Bastable
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Philosophy 676
  • History and Philosophy of Science 153
  • Theoretical Computer Science 22
  • Classics 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 138
Replace Newton Garver with:
Newton Garver United States
Benedictus de Spinoza
George Alexander Kennedy United States
William H. Dray Canada
Maurice Mandelbaum United States
Daniel Sommer Robinson
J. O. Urmson United Kingdom
Jerome B. Schneewind United States
E. D. Hirsch United States
Karl‐Otto Apel Germany
James D. Bastable relative to Newton Garver United States Newton Garver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
Newton Garver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Bastable

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Bastable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Bastable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Bastable more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Bastable

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Bastable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Bastable. The network helps show where James D. Bastable may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Hit paper breakdown →
1961618
2 1964116
3 195788
4 196677
5 196144
6 196442
7 196541
8 195837
9 195728
10 196427
11 196827
12 195623
13 195819
14 196418
15 196518
16 195615
17 195715
18 196115
19 196413
20 195210

About James D. Bastable

James D. Bastable is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Social Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, History and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (16 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (12 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (11 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (9 papers), Philosophical Thought and Analysis (9 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (676 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (153 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations), Classics (68 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (138 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact