James Compton
Impact in
- Communication top 2%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Papers in
-
- Media Studies and Communication 6
- Social Media and Politics 4
-
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 2
- Co-authors
- David Skinner (3 shared papers)Mike Gasher (3 shared papers)Nick Dyer‐Witheford (1 shared paper)Edward A. Comor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journalism Studies (2 papers)Journalism (1 paper)Media Culture & Society (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Communication (2 papers)TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Compton
11 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Communication 200
- Literature and Literary Theory 51
- Philosophy 34
- Gender Studies 28
- Sociology and Political Science 97
Countries citing papers authored by James Compton
This map shows the geographic impact of James Compton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Compton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Compton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Compton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Compton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Compton. The network helps show where James Compton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside James Compton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 2 | Putting theory to practice A critical approach to journalism studies | 2001 | 60 |
| 3 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 49 | |
| 5 | Converging media, diverging politics : a political economy of news media in the United States and Canada | 2005 | 34 |
| 6 | The Integrated News Spectacle: A Political Economy of Cultural Performance | 2004 | 23 |
| 7 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 10 | Journalistic Labour and Technological Fetishism | 2015 | 4 |
| 11 | 2010 | 1 |
About James Compton
James Compton is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (1 paper), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (200 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Philosophy (34 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (97 citations). James Compton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Skinner, Mike Gasher, Nick Dyer‐Witheford and Edward A. Comor. Their work appears in journals such as Journalism Studies, Journalism, Media Culture & Society, Canadian Journal of Communication and TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.