James Burns

2.9k citations
62 papers · 2.0k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

James Burns

58 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

James Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Clinical Psychology 682
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 251
  • Pharmacy 69
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 185
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 100
Replace Ingemar Engström with:
Ingemar Engström Sweden
Arne Holte Norway
Christian Bachmann Germany
Jeffrey E. Cassisi United States
Zina Trost United States
Bruce J. Masek United States
Alexander R. Lucas United States
Scott A. Paluska United States
Alex Harley Crisp Brazil
Brent R. Collett United States
James Burns relative to Ingemar Engström Sweden Ingemar Engström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ingemar Engström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Burns. The network helps show where James Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Burns Line = papers co-authored together James Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004256
2 2015214
3 2012164
4 2008132
5 1996131
6 2013112
7 2009102
8 199380
9 200877
10 201268
11 200661
12 200747
13 200039
14 201536
15 201535
16 201930
17 201825
18 201424
19 201123
20 199222

About James Burns

James Burns is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Surgery, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (15 papers), Music Therapy and Health (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (682 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (251 citations), Pharmacy (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (185 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (100 citations). James Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lauren S. Wakschlag, Margaret J. Briggs‐Gowan, Alice S. Carter, Brian R. Flay, Eisuke Segawa, Robert F. Kushner, Seung W. Choi, Bennett Leventhal, Kimberly J. McCarthy and Ryne Estabrook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Pathology, Neurotoxicology and Teratology, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Music Therapy Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact