James Booth
Impact in
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 10%
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 5
- Surgery 3
- Co-authors
- William Johnson (1 shared paper)Nathalie Johnson (1 shared paper)D Franzini (1 shared paper)Eugene Chang (1 shared paper)Bruce L. Webber (1 shared paper)James P. Scheetz (1 shared paper)Jack E. Lemons (1 shared paper)Henry E. Wang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Spine Journal (2 papers)Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (1 paper)PeerJ (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Gynecologic Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Booth
13 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Medical Laboratory Technology 16
- Cancer Research 77
- Family Practice 9
- Oral Surgery 24
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
Countries citing papers authored by James Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of James Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Booth. The network helps show where James Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 4 | Identification of Gout Flares in Chief Complaint Text Using Natural Language Processing. | 2020 | 9 |
| 5 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 1 |
About James Booth
James Booth is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nephrology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (2 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (16 citations), Cancer Research (77 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Oral Surgery (24 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations). James Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William Johnson, Nathalie Johnson, D Franzini, Eugene Chang, Bruce L. Webber, James P. Scheetz, Jack E. Lemons, Henry E. Wang, Paul D. Eleazer and John P. Donnelly. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, PeerJ, The American Journal of Surgery and Gynecologic Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.