James Boocock

5.4k citations
34 papers · 766 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 7
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 4
    • Forensic and Genetic Research 3
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 3
    • Fungal and yeast genetics research 3

James Boocock

32 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

James Boocock
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nephrology 115
  • Aging 28
  • Genetics 364
  • Geography, Planning and Development 44
  • Paleontology 43
Replace W. Douglas Scheer with:
W. Douglas Scheer United States
Toru Shimizu Japan
Haiyi Lou China
Ricardo A. Verdugo Chile
Satish Kumar United States
Yaqun Guan China
Sara De Fanti Italy
Ryszard Pawłowski Poland
Rui Peng China
James Boocock relative to W. Douglas Scheer United States W. Douglas Scheer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×67×
W. Douglas Scheer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Boocock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Boocock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Boocock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Boocock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Boocock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Boocock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Boocock. The network helps show where James Boocock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Boocock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Boocock Line = papers co-authored together James Boocock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018159
2 201857
3 201453
4 202049
5 201948
6 201746
7 201833
8 201731
9 201931
10 200130
11 202126
12 202126
13 201524
14 201822
15 202221
16 201821
17 201520
18 201618
19 202112
20 20169

About James Boocock

James Boocock is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Paleontology and Ecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (7 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (115 citations), Aging (28 citations), Genetics (364 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (44 citations) and Paleontology (43 citations). James Boocock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tony R. Merriman, Leonid Kruglyak, Joshua S. Bloom, Bogdan Paşaniuc, Michael A. Black, Panos Roussos, Murray Cadzow, Claudia Giambartolomei, Andrew E. Jaffe and Huwenbo Shi. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Human Molecular Genetics, PLoS ONE, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact