James A. Grieve

876 citations
37 papers · 596 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James A. Grieve

32 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

James A. Grieve
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 15
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 358
  • Biomedical Engineering 231
  • Automotive Engineering 56
  • Biophysics 23
Replace Chung-Hao Tien with:
Chung-Hao Tien Taiwan
Min Gu China
Alfonso Carmelo Cino Italy
Bohan Zhang United States
Carlo Gigli France
Woosung Kim South Korea
Silvia Ledesma Argentina
Toni Saastamoinen Finland
Itzik Malkiel Israel
James A. Grieve relative to Chung-Hao Tien Taiwan Chung-Hao Tien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Chung-Hao Tien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James A. Grieve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Grieve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Grieve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Grieve. The network helps show where James A. Grieve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James A. Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James A. Grieve Line = papers co-authored together James A. Grieve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200873
2 201370
3 201159
4 201242
5 200935
6 201635
7 202034
8 201232
9 200630
10 201029
11 201627
12 201126
13 201816
14 201512
15 201911
16 201610
17 20227
18 20217
19 20246
20 20076

About James A. Grieve

James A. Grieve is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (4 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (15 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (358 citations), Biomedical Engineering (231 citations), Automotive Engineering (56 citations) and Biophysics (23 citations). James A. Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include D. M. Carberry, M. J. Miles, David L. Daggett, Kaushik Rajashekara, Miles J. Padgett, David B. Phillips, Richard Bowman, Alexander Ling, Graham M. Gibson and Sam N. Olof. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, EPJ Quantum Technology, Nanotechnology, Advanced Optical Materials and Optica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact