Jaime Keller

1.3k citations
90 papers · 823 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jaime Keller

87 papers receiving 755 citations

Peers

Jaime Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Condensed Matter Physics 227
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 459
  • Applied Mathematics 99
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 79
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 85
Replace Hubert W. Joy with:
Hubert W. Joy United States
B. Raoult France
M. F. de Feraudy France
F. Tommasini Italy
Stanley A. Hagstrom United States
S. A. Safron United States
Charles L. Beckel United States
M. P. Tosi Italy
G. Signorelli Italy
L. Wharton United States
Jaime Keller relative to Hubert W. Joy United States Hubert W. Joy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Hubert W. Joy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime Keller. The network helps show where Jaime Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime Keller Line = papers co-authored together Jaime Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197157
2 197152
3 197144
4 199042
5 197728
6 197126
7 198324
8 197923
9 197522
10 200122
11 197922
12 197919
13 197618
14 197917
15 199117
16 199217
17 197215
18 197915
19 200114
20 197913

About Jaime Keller

Jaime Keller is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, Applied Mathematics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 90 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (27 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (15 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (9 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (8 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (5 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (227 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (459 citations), Applied Mathematics (99 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (79 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (85 citations). Jaime Keller has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include M. Erbudak, José L. Gázquez, Roger Evans, J. Schoenes, R C Jones, O. Vogt, John Ziman, E. Kaldis, Miguel Castro and J. Karpiński. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Solid State Communications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact