Jacob Brix
Impact in
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Coal and Its By-products
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Combustion and flame dynamics
Papers in
-
- Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes 5
- Catalysis for Biomass Conversion 1
-
- Industrial Gas Emission Control 1
- Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Anker Degn Jensen (5 shared papers)Peter Arendt Jensen (3 shared papers)Peter Glarborg (2 shared papers)Maja Bøg Toftegaard (1 shared paper)Sønnik Clausen (1 shared paper)Leyre Gómez (1 shared paper)Jakob Kjøbsted Huusom (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Fuel (3 papers)International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering (1 paper)Progress in Energy and Combustion Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Denmark
In The Last Decade
Jacob Brix
6 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Jacob Brix's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Geochemistry and Petrology 155
- Computational Mechanics 424
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 110
- Biomedical Engineering 766
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 97
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Brix
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Brix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Brix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Brix more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Brix
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Brix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Brix. The network helps show where Jacob Brix may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jacob Brix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oxy-fuel combustion of solid fuels Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 945 |
| 2 | 2010 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 6 | Oxy-Fuel Combustion of Coal | 2011 | 1 |
About Jacob Brix
Jacob Brix is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Geochemistry and Petrology and Catalysis, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (5 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (2 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (1 paper), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (1 paper), Industrial Gas Emission Control (1 paper), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (1 paper), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (1 paper) and Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (155 citations), Computational Mechanics (424 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (110 citations), Biomedical Engineering (766 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (97 citations). Jacob Brix has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anker Degn Jensen, Peter Arendt Jensen, Peter Glarborg, Maja Bøg Toftegaard, Sønnik Clausen, Leyre Gómez and Jakob Kjøbsted Huusom. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering and Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.