Jaclyn Leith

769 citations
21 papers · 535 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jaclyn Leith

21 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Jaclyn Leith
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Applied Psychology 80
  • Clinical Psychology 207
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 123
  • Family Practice 17
  • General Health Professions 177
Replace Jennifer Humensky with:
Jennifer Humensky United States
Dan Bilsker Canada
Robert L. Hubbard United States
Karine Bertrand Canada
M. Scott Young United States
Jason Matejkowski United States
Michael Donmall United Kingdom
Kenneth E. Hart United States
Marcel A. de Dios United States
Funda Kavak Budak Türkiye
Jaclyn Leith relative to Jennifer Humensky United States Jennifer Humensky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jennifer Humensky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaclyn Leith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaclyn Leith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaclyn Leith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaclyn Leith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaclyn Leith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaclyn Leith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaclyn Leith. The network helps show where Jaclyn Leith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaclyn Leith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaclyn Leith Line = papers co-authored together Jaclyn Leith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200978
2 201258
3 201949
4 200839
5 200935
6 200834
7 201128
8 201128
9 200928
10 200826
11 201623
12 200921
13 201019
14 201218
15 201717
16 201411
17 20147
18 20145
19 20154
20 20094

About Jaclyn Leith

Jaclyn Leith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (207 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (123 citations), Family Practice (17 citations) and General Health Professions (177 citations). Jaclyn Leith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lisa B. Dixon, Deborah R. Medoff, Catherine H. Stein, Wendy Potts, Amy L. Drapalski, Seth Himelhoch, Julie Kreyenbuhl, Richard W. Goldberg, Ann Hackman and Dina L. G. Borzekowski. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Psychiatry Research, American Journal on Addictions, Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact