Jaclyn Leith

782 citations
21 papers · 623 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jaclyn Leith

21 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Jaclyn Leith
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Clinical Psychology 209
  • Health 57
  • Social Psychology 155
  • General Health Professions 167
Replace Jennifer Humensky with:
Jennifer Humensky United States
Robert L. Hubbard United States
John Logan United States
Larry H. Ingraham United States
Hilde Pape Norway
Charlie Lloyd United Kingdom
Deanna M. Pérez United States
Kathryn Higgins United Kingdom
Chiara Samele United Kingdom
Irwin Sandler United States
Jaclyn Leith relative to Jennifer Humensky United States Jennifer Humensky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jennifer Humensky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaclyn Leith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaclyn Leith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaclyn Leith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaclyn Leith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaclyn Leith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaclyn Leith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaclyn Leith. The network helps show where Jaclyn Leith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaclyn Leith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaclyn Leith Line = papers co-authored together Jaclyn Leith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200979
2 200865
3 200861
4 201259
5 201952
6 201144
7 200937
8 200931
9 201129
10 200828
11 201625
12 200922
13 201019
14 201218
15 201717
16 201412
17 20147
18 20146
19 20154
20 20204

About Jaclyn Leith

Jaclyn Leith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations), Health (57 citations), Social Psychology (155 citations) and General Health Professions (167 citations). Jaclyn Leith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lisa B. Dixon, Deborah R. Medoff, Catherine H. Stein, Amy L. Drapalski, Wendy Potts, Diana Seybolt, Seth Himelhoch, Julie Kreyenbuhl, Richard W. Goldberg and Dina L. G. Borzekowski. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, American Journal on Addictions, Psychiatry Research, Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses and Journal of Homosexuality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact