Jack Penn
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Dermatology top 10%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 5
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 2
- Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies 2
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1
- Facial Trauma and Fracture Management 1
- Co-authors
- Theodore Gillman (7 shared papers)Michael K S Hathorn (2 shared papers)Simon C. Williams (4 shared papers)Nicola Newall (4 shared papers)Hani Joseph Marcus (4 shared papers)Thomas Searle (1 shared paper)Lewis W. Thorne (2 shared papers)Richard Dobson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (8 papers)Nature (3 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)British journal of surgery (1 paper)European Spine Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Jack Penn
19 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Rehabilitation 77
- Dermatology 61
- Surgery 212
- Urology 26
- Anatomy 5
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Penn
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Penn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Penn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Penn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Penn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Penn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Penn. The network helps show where Jack Penn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jack Penn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1954 | 113 | |
| 2 | 1953 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1955 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1954 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1953 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1955 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1955 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1963 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1956 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1960 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1956 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1956 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1953 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Jack Penn
Jack Penn is a scholar working on Dermatology, Surgery, Neurology, Rehabilitation and Anatomy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers), History of Medical Practice (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper) and Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (77 citations), Dermatology (61 citations), Surgery (212 citations), Urology (26 citations) and Anatomy (5 citations). Jack Penn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Theodore Gillman, Michael K S Hathorn, Simon C. Williams, Nicola Newall, Hani Joseph Marcus, Thomas Searle, Lewis W. Thorne, Richard Dobson, Naomi L. Fersht and Michael Kosmin. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Nature, The American Journal of Surgery, British journal of surgery and European Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.