Jack Maze

840 citations
77 papers · 636 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Maze

76 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Jack Maze
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 196
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 281
  • Plant Science 275
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Forestry 15
Replace Georges Cremers with:
Georges Cremers France
L. A. S. Johnson Australia
Josephine M. Ward New Zealand
Maurici Mus Spain
A. V. Hall South Africa
Richard Spellenberg United States
Gillian M. Puttick United States
Alexis A. Ducousso France
Santiago Espinel Spain
Kenichiro Shimatani Japan
Jack Maze relative to Georges Cremers France Georges Cremers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Georges Cremers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Maze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Maze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Maze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Maze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Maze. The network helps show where Jack Maze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Maze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Maze Line = papers co-authored together Jack Maze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197528
2 197728
3 199628
4 196826
5 198525
6 197125
7 198122
8 199022
9 197220
10 198915
11 198414
12 197313
13 198413
14 197913
15 197413
16 200912
17
A multivariate analysis of the trichomes of Hedera L.
198911
18 198511
19 198611
20 197911

About Jack Maze

Jack Maze is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (28 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (13 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (13 papers), Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (11 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (196 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (281 citations), Plant Science (275 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations) and Forestry (15 citations). Jack Maze has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary E. Bradfield, William H. Parker, Peter R. Sibbald, Nancy G. Dengler, Bruce A. Bohm, Nina Vogt, Kedi Yang, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby, Gillian L. Rapson and Roy Turkington. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, International Journal of Plant Sciences, Taxon, Biosystems and Phytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact