Jack Maze

840 citations
79 papers · 710 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Maze

78 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Jack Maze
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 201
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 314
  • Plant Science 325
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
  • Forestry 16
Replace Dwight T. Kincaid with:
Dwight T. Kincaid United States
Georges Cremers France
Donald R. Kaplan United States
L. A. S. Johnson Australia
A. V. Hall South Africa
Maurici Mus Spain
Gillian M. Puttick United States
Richard Spellenberg United States
H. N. Barber Australia
Hans Walter Lack Germany
Jack Maze relative to Dwight T. Kincaid United States Dwight T. Kincaid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Dwight T. Kincaid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Maze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Maze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Maze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Maze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Maze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Maze. The network helps show where Jack Maze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Maze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Maze Line = papers co-authored together Jack Maze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197536
2 199631
3 197729
4 197127
5 198526
6 196826
7 198125
8 199025
9 197221
10 197918
11 198417
12 197316
13 197415
14 198915
15 198414
16 200914
17 197913
18 197012
19 198712
20
A multivariate analysis of the trichomes of Hedera L.
198911

About Jack Maze

Jack Maze is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 79 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (28 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (14 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (14 papers), Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (12 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (201 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (314 citations), Plant Science (325 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations) and Forestry (16 citations). Jack Maze has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include William H. Parker, Gary E. Bradfield, Peter R. Sibbald, Bruce A. Bohm, Nancy G. Dengler, Kedi Yang, Nina Vogt, Roy Turkington, Yousry A. El‐Kassaby and Gillian L. Rapson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Taxon, International Journal of Plant Sciences, Biosystems and Phytochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact